Quad City Federation of Labor

NO-EXCUSE ABSENTEE VOTING IN ILLINOIS

December 29, 2009 · Comments Off

You no longer need an excuse to vote absentee in IllinoisPrimary Election Date on February 2, 2010.

A recent change in the law allows a registered voter to request and vote an absentee ballot without specifying a reason for the 2010 Primary Election Date on February 2, 2010.

A registered voter can obtain an application to vote absentee by mail or in person at the County Clerk’s Office beginning December 24, 2009, until February 1, 2010

A registered voter may apply to the Coujty Clerk to vote absentee by mail:

In the U.S.: 12/24/2009 – 1/27/2010

Outside the U.S.: 12/24/2009 – 01/02/2010

For a list of election sites: 

 www.elections.state.il.us or call the Illinois AFL-CIO at 217/544-4014.

Comments OffCategories: News

2010 becoming banner year for labor

December 28, 2009 · Comments Off

On December 7, 2009, the Department of Labor released its annual Statement of Regulatory and Deregulatory Priorities. Don’t feel left out if you didn’t read anything about this in your newspaper or see it covered by cable news. Google search the report and you’ll find only a couple articles written about it. However dismissive the mainstream media is to enforcing labor law, workers should be glad to know that under the leadership of Secretary Hilda Solis, Obama’s Labor Department has gotten back to the business of looking out for the rights of labor rather than the interests of commerce. The report is available online at: http://www.dol.gov/asp/regs/unifiedagenda/fall_2009_Regulatory_Plan.pdf

“Good jobs for everyone” is the mantra running through the document. Among the new regulatory items, here are the highlights:

• Companies would be required to file financial disclosures on their union-busting activity. Through a decades-old loophole, the Wal-Mart’s of the World have avoided reporting how much they spend to intimidate and harass workers trying to form a union by claiming the firms hired are only “advising” with the employer and in no way deal with workers.

• 3rd parties may now report wage and hour violations. This is huge. As the DOL themselves put it, “because workers are fearful of losing their jobs in this economy and therefore less likely to file complaints when they are cheated,” a 3rd party, which has sufficient information to indicate a probable violation, may report the abuse, and the DOL may act on such tips. It’s as easy as calling 866-4US-WAGE.

• Companies will now be required to document a separate ergonomic job injury log in their Occupational Safety and Health Administration reports. No more dismissing carpel-tunnel and other repetitive motion injuries.

• Regulations are mere words on paper unless there are actual people to administrate them, so the Wage and Hour Division gets to hire 250 new investigators – not nearly enough, but a major departure from a decade of attrition and a fox watching the henhouse regulatory culture. The division will focus on industries with high violation rates such as agriculture, restaurants, janitorial, construction and car washes.

• New regulations advancing safety standards to protect workers from a type of combustible dust – diacetyl – the artificial butter flavoring used in microwave popcorn and the source of potentially deadly diseases. This is monumental for Iowa’s popcorn workers in Hamburg, Sioux City, Manson, or Sac City, Iowa.

• There is also better regulation of exposure to crystalline silica dust, a common exposure for workers in construction and maritime industries, which causes debilitating respiratory disease and which may ultimately be fatal.

• Pay stubs will be required to have a detailed breakdown of how pay is computed to guard against wage theft.

• In the age of contractors, workers’ rights are often the first sacrifice to maximizing profits. Now all government contractors are required to post notices of their workers’ rights under federal labor laws. Seems ridiculous that employers have to be forced to do something so simple. • Strengthening the restrictions of how much coal dust workers are allowed to inhale. Again, seems so simple, yet the present rule of 2mg per cubic meter of air was set in 1972, and federal studies conducted over a decade ago had advised lowering the limits substantially – a piece of advice the Bush Administration conveniently ignored.

Additionally, programs like Youth Build and Trade Adjustment Assistance for dislocated workers will also get revamping so they encompass more workers. The nineteen items described are listed below. Though they are not the concrete legislative acts that organized labor would like to see made part of our nation’s laws, these rules and administrative changes are indeed a blessing for the new year.

• YouthBuild Program Regulation

• Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers Program; Regulations

• Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship and Training, Amendment of Regulations

• Temporary Agricultural Employment of H-2A Aliens in the United States

• Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans • Definition of “Fiduciary” — Investment Advice

• Health Care Arrangements Established by State and Local Governments for Non-Governmental Employees

• Genetic Information Nondiscrimination

• Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act

• The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, as Amended

• Records To Be Kept by Employers Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

• Interpretation of the “Advice” Exemption of Section 203(c) of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act

• Child Labor Regulations, Orders, and Statements of Interpretation

• Occupational Exposure to Crystalline Silica

• Hazard Communication • Cranes and Derricks in Construction • Metal and Nonmetal Impoundments • Respirable Crystalline Silica Standard

• Occupational Exposure to Coal Mine Dust (Lowering Exposure)

Comments OffCategories: News

STATEMENT BY BOB KRAUSE Democratic Candidate, United States Senate

December 22, 2009 · Comments Off

NOTE: The Quad City Federation of Labor has not endorsed anyone for the US Senate seat being contested in 2010 in Iowa. However, until we do, we welcome any candidates to post their statements concerning labor and job creation. Send your posts to quadcityfed@netexpress.net

Statement Concerning Comprehensive Jobs Preservation and Recovery Policy

 I applaud the efforts of President Barack Obama and our Democratic Congress to move forward on generating new jobs for Iowans and every other American. However, many that are unemployed today simply cannot wait for the current measures to succeed. In addition, the chance for a stalled economy and increased unemployment looms. U.S. economist Nouriel Roubini, the first economist to forecast the global crash, predicts that 25% of the remaining U.S. jobs will to be outsourced in times to come, given current U.S. trade policies. This is of huge concern. There are approximately 135 million jobs remaining in the United States today. A 25-percent reduction in jobs at today’s level amounts to future job losses of 34 million.

The mathematics of job losses and requirements from different sources raises the barrier to recovery. Since the beginning of the recession in 2007, 7.5 million jobs have disappeared, on top of the 8 million people that were unemployed at the beginning of the recession. At the same time, the pool of potential workers in the U.S. continues to grow at about 1.25 million per year.

So, just to keep even over a ten-year horizon—given outsourcing (3.4 million per year) plus labor force growth (1.25 million per year)—the U.S. economy needs to generate about 4.65 million new fulltime jobs per year just to stay even. If we want to minimize personal disruption by getting back to pre-recession unemployment levels in two years, we have to generate an additional 3.65 million jobs per year. All told, that is a requirement of 8.3 million new jobs in each of the next two years, and currently we are producing NO new jobs. This is a Herculean task, and one that is being left unacknowledged and undone in Washington DC with our current Senator.

As painful as these aggregate numbers are, we must also look at long-term joblessness. Of the current 16 million jobless workers, 1 in 3 have been unemployed for at least 6 months—and at least 2 million have been unemployed for 12 months or more. Today, there is 1 vacancy for every 6 unemployed—the highest rate in 60 years. Four specific groups have it harder than most—African Americans, overall, are at a 15.7% rate. Young (under 35) African-American men are at a staggering 36.4% rate. Latinos, overall, are at a 13.1 % rate and persons with disabilities are at 14.1%. Men, overall, are at an 11.4% unemployment rate and blue -collar workers are at 50% higher rates than that of white-collar workers.

This is a national crisis of the magnitude of the Great Depression. It requires emergency action. To address this, I call for a national program to preserve existing jobs and to create new ones. First, we must change policy dramatically to keep the jobs that we have. The Bush Administration algorithm of free trade has failed—simply because free trade is not fair trade, nor is it without cost to America. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements were not developed with labor advocates, worker-safety advocates, environmentalists or human-rights advocates at the table. They were developed by individuals who believed that American workers were paid too much and that they could get services cheaper overseas. We need to address those deficiencies and begin focusing our efforts on FAIR TRADE internationally instead of on the last 3 decade’s failed concept of Free Trade. Because of this supposedly free trade approach, in Iowa and across America, we have seen many good-paying manufacturing jobs—such as 850 Electrolux jobs in Webster City—go overseas.

Not only are the jobs exported, but environmental, worker safety, and social justice problems are exported to other countries. And, thanks to Senator Charles Grassley’s opposition to Sen. Hollings’ amendment to end job-export subsidies—which failed to pass several years ago—American taxpayers actually subsidize the process by which jobs are exported. As your United States Senator, I will press for a number of solutions:

1. While this national emergency lasts, I will work for emergency legislation to prevent most of the exportation of jobs overseas. This emergency legislation will be in effect pending re-negotiation of international trade and tariff agreements, and will look at international trade through a “fair trade” matrix. It will look, particularly, at industries that affect national defense, but will also look at any job where the social impacts of the transfer are, on the balance, detrimental to American society, or which export societal problems from America to other nations. This includes U.S. trade-based job creation overseas that worsens global climate change through use of dirty fuels; that significantly impacts the environment negatively through the destruction of sensitive habitat or through destruction of land, water or air resources; that violates internationally-recognized human rights standards concerning slave, child or indentured labor; that prevents the right of workers to organize; or that creates worker-safety issues at a rate higher than U.S. worker-safety rates for similar employees. Where a detrimental situation exists, tariffs will be adjusted to keep predatory corporate executives from profiting by harming the interests of US workers. In doing so, my goal will be to reduce the overseas transfer of existing jobs by at least 75% within the next two years.

2. I will shift the overseas profits paradigm that is driving more and more jobs overseas. Today, profits from American firms made overseas remain tax-free as long as they remain overseas. Over the years, this profit pool has turned into an enemy of U.S. economic growth because it funds the development of new overseas plants that are used to further outsource American jobs. I will propose that the tax be reversed. If the profits are repatriated to the U.S. for the purpose of building American plants, American research and American development, then these profits will be tax free. If these profits are not used in this fashion, they will be taxed—either while remaining overseas or as repatriated to America.

3. I will promote policies to immediately boost the economic standing of those Americans suffering the economic toll of these predatory policies. They are the consumers that must drive the economy to resurgence. I will seek an immediate significant increase in the national minimum wage. As a policy, the minimum wage is precisely the opposite of the trickle-down economic policies that we have become addicted to. Money injected into the BASE of the economic pyramid strengthens our foundations. Because of the condition of those receiving a minimum wage, it is income that will likely be spent and will thus quickly create more circulation of money within the U.S. economy than nearly any other policy. Buffering the minimum wage increase with emergency trade protections will help focus benefit on the huge number of blue-collar workers that need employment immediately.

4. I will seek a revised formula for unemployment compensation that more fully reflects the social-safety-net nature of the program. Because of this, a broader definition of the payroll tax that supports the program is needed. Specifically, state standards for unemployment compensation payouts need to be reviewed and readjusted to better reflect the long-term “personal sustainment” purpose of unemployment compensation during this huge economic crisis. In these unusual times, unemployment compensation needs to be made available to part-time, temporary, and self-employed workers.

5. I will advocate a second stimulus package oriented toward infrastructure and the support of renewable energy, energy conservation and twenty-first century competitive technologies. Because of the emergency trade legislation enacted—which will act as a lever for jobs preservation and growth—the stimulus package will be smaller than it would otherwise need to be in order to get the economy rolling. However, there may be very short window before the economy is in danger of a second dip. As the first stimulus package dwindles, a second wave of impacts is possible. This includes accelerating job loss as manufacturers driven by competitive pressure increase outsourcing, and expiring loan covenants creates the long-forecasted commercial property melt-down. Promoting infrastructure projects is a traditional way to increase blue-collar unemployment where the economic pain is the worst today. A strong “buy American” provision will be included in any stimulus package.

6. I will focus stimulus funds into small business entrepreneurship in a very significant way in order to rebuild our economic jobs foundation from the bottom. Small businesses have historically been the bastion of innovation and job growth in our society. This balance between large and small companies needs to be realigned if America is to thrive. Individuals from segments of the population with unemployment above national norms in this economic crisis will be given special incentives to break the unemployment cycle.

7. I will advocate an emergency expansion of student aid for higher education and trade schools in order to soak up some of the unemployed until the job market improves. This is very much akin to an intellectual infrastructure project, where we invest in minds that can make America stronger. The money would be targeted directly at tuition grants for students and will serve to augment the Pell Grant dollars that have been massively underfunded for the last 3 decades. This “direct grant” approach is necessary to insure that the funds do not go to extraneous overhead at the schools—but will instead DIRECTLY benefit workers/students.

8. I will include special provisions to accelerate hiring for disadvantaged classes of workers that are significantly above national unemployment averages.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, December 20, 2009 Contact: Keith Dinsmore 573-230-5360 keith@krauseforiowa.com

Comments OffCategories: News

Senate Speech Heralds New Social Movement: Single-Payer Health Care gets first serious consideration in Senate

December 22, 2009 · Comments Off

The Bernie Sanders speech is at: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=9083042

Published on Sunday, December 20, 2009 by CommonDreams.org http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/12/20-0

by Margaret Flowers and Andy Coates

This week the sincere effort of millions of people across the nation once again proved effective in the face of determined opposition from the White House and Congress, as single payer health reform reached another milestone in its historic journey. When the Senate initiated its debate on health insurance reform, Senator Bernie Sanders offered a single-payer amendment, with co-sponsors Sherrod Brown and Roland Burris. Initially Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid skipped over it, allowing other amendments to come to the floor instead. But nationwide events on International Human Rights Day, the delivery of paper “bodies” to the senate offices, non-violent civil disobedience including nine arrests at Senator Schumer’s office, and hundreds of thousands of emails and phone calls and faxes to the Senate evidently changed Reid’s mind.

When Sanders introduced his amendment the Senator from Oklahoma, Dr. Coburn, rose according to the rules of the Senate to insist that the bill be read in full. It was estimated that reading the 767-page bill would take days, stalling a galloping Senate process. We wondered: Could this be an unexpected gift? If Senator Lieberman could make an intransigent stand on behalf of the insurance companies, would Sanders make a stand on behalf of the health of the people? Reading the bill would prompt our movement to swing into action yet again. We would invite the nation to tune in to C-SPAN to hear how a national single payer health system would provide comprehensive high-quality health care to all citizens. Yet Coburn’s maneuver had its effect. Reid demanded that Sanders withdraw the amendment, for the Senate timetable leading up to Christmas could not be delayed. Besides insurance reform, there was the pressing issue of funding the wars. Within 3 hours Sanders agreed. In return he got 30 minutes on the Senate floor.

Sanders’ speech was riveting. He spoke the words that we have been waiting to hear for so long. He spoke about the beauty and simplicity of Medicare for All. He spoke about having the courage to stand up to the medical-industrial complex which profits at the expense of human suffering. Most importantly, Sanders spoke about the national movement for single payer being led by nurses, doctors, medical students, faith and labor organizations and people across the land of all backgrounds and beliefs. He declared that this strong movement is not going away and he announced that we will succeed.

So we will remember December 16th, 2009 as a turning point in the struggle for health care justice. Single payer started this year “off the table.” But the accumulating efforts of millions of people delivered it to the floor of the United States Senate. To win single-payer health reform it will take many more speeches on the floor of Congress. And the only force that will propel Congress forward is a great social movement. In 2009 we have seen that movement rising up – and getting results.

Every day more people see that an effective and just health system is already at hand: a single-payer national health program modeled on the Medicare system. And every day that the White House and Congress delay single-payer reform, people suffer needlessly and die preventable deaths. Yet the Senate blunders on, with a colossal gift to the insurance industry. It is time for the health of human beings to prevail. It is time to end the insurance cartel.

Please join us as we continue forge the movement that will win Medicare for All. Onward to single payer. Margaret Flowers is a pediatrician in Baltimore, co-chair of the Maryland chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) and PNHP Congressional Fellow. Andy Coates is an internist in Albany, secretary of the Capital District (NY) chapter of PNHP and co-chair of Single Payer New York.

Distributed by: All Unions Committee For Single Payer Health Care–HR 676 c/o Nurses Professional Organization (NPO) 1169 Eastern Parkway, Suite 2218 Louisville, KY 40217 (502) 636 1551 Email: nursenpo@aol.com http://unionsforsinglepayerHR676.org

Comments OffCategories: News

House Passes Financial Reform… on to the Senate!

December 14, 2009 · Comments Off

On Friday, the House of Representatives voted 223-202 to pass the most sweeping re-write of the laws governing Wall Street since the Great Depression. Your support and follow through with lawmakers was invaluable in ensuring this bill’s passage. As the fight moves to the Senate, we must redouble our efforts to ensure the labor movement’s four core objectives emerge in the final bill:

(1) a Consumer Financial Protection Agency to police mortgages, credit cards, payday and student loans

(2) Reform the Federal Reserve or create an agency that’s capable of stopping systemic risk

(3) Regulate the shadow markets (hedge funds, derivatives, private equity) before they do more damage

(4) Reform corporate governance and CEO pay to protect working people who are long-term investors, not speculators.

Also, here’s a link to a short blog post we published on the day the bill passed:

Once again, thanks for your help in achieving this milestone. While we have more work to do, we sent a clear message to Wall Street that they work for us, not the other way around.

Comments OffCategories: News

Pictures from When the Paycheck Stops

December 13, 2009 · Comments Off

Comments OffCategories: News

Job Creation still looms as Obama nears end of first year of presidency

December 11, 2009 · Comments Off

As I reflect on President Obama’s first year in office, it’s difficult for me to not think about the painful chapter on post-Apartheid South Africa in Naomi Klein’s book analyzing neo-liberal economic policies, “The Shock Doctrine.”

After Nelson Mandela’s historic victory in abolishing Apartheid, the South African nation and world are in a euphoric state, high on the realization that yes we can prevail over the entrenched racism and colonialism that had been oppressing the aboriginal peoples of the African continent for half a millennia.

However, in the re-building of the South African nation’s socio-economic infrastructure, something went awry. While finally the majority population of black South Africans could now vote and enjoy for the first time many of the rights of citizenry, a policy shift led by Mandela’s election sweep in 1994 and lauded in the press the world over – the economic plan for the country remained in the same hands of the powerful white elite that had ruled the country for decades. And in crushing irony, a decade after Apartheid’s end, by 2005 “economically, South Africa has surpassed Brazil as the most unequal society in the world.”

Yes, I am still thankful for Obama’s historic victory, and yes, I recognize that one cannot undue decades of financial deregulation and labor losses in just one year. I know there is no magic wand to fix the system, that Obama did not cause the financial meltdown. I recall that Obama did sign the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act as his first piece of legislation. He appointed Hilda Solis Doyle as his very labor-friendly Secretary of Labor. And he reversed many of Bush’s anti-labor policies with Executive Orders signed almost immediately after taking office. Yes, there is much to be thankful for.

I also appreciate what must be Obama’s frustration at dealing with a speak – softly Democratic caucus but a carry a big stick Republican caucus in Congress.

Yet I must express my astonishment at comments made by Obama at the December 3rd Jobs Summit which included 130 leaders from both the business community and labor, including AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka.

The AFL-CIO and liberal think tanks like the Economic Policy Institute have suggested that, among other things, what we need to do to provide direct relief to the nation’s millions of unemployed workers is a government jobs program similar to the Works Progress Administration from the 1930’s. That is, if the private sector cannot guarantee jobs, the government must.

This is no foreign concept after all. President Roosevelt’s New Deal of 1935 created 21 million jobs over seven years in the aftermath of the Great Depression. Many of our nation’s roads, bridges, schools, parks and post offices were created by this venture. We did this at a total cost of $160 billion in today’s dollars.

Obama listened to the concerns of Labor and said that while he appreciates the need for federal investment to fight the nation’s high unemployment, private business, not government, must lead future job growth. “Ultimately, true economic recovery is only going to come from the private sector.”

While I agree that it is the private sector which has historically driven job creation, I find Obama’s use of the word “only” in that statement extremely problematic.

In the course of the past year we have witnessed a government ready, willing and able to all it can to bail out its banks despite their eponymous failures and bonus blunders. Citibank alone has been guaranteed protection of upwards of $277 billion in losses from its toxic assets. Lots of money to you and me but chump change compared to the $23.7 trillion that Neil Barofsky, the inspector general charged with overseeing TARP, estimates the total cost of Wall Street bailouts to eventually reach.

Obama agreed in theory with point five of the AFL-CIO’s five-point program for job creation, that “we should put some of the billions of dollars in leftover Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to work creating jobs by enabling community banks to lend money to small- and medium-size businesses. If small businesses can get credit, they will create jobs.”

But the administration has been firm in saying it will not spend TARP money – nor for that matter any other funding mechanism – directly on the job-creation, “”Let me be clear, I am open to every demonstrably good idea. And I want to take every responsible step to accelerate job creation. We also though have to face the fact that our resources are limited,” Obama said.

That Obama suggests our government no longer has the funds to directly create jobs may appease fiscally-conservative critics, but it’s an insult to workers who are already on the hook for a bank bailout that New York University Nouriel Roubini famously characterized as “socializing risk and privatizing gain.”

According to the Economic Policy Institute, to fill in the gap of job loss over the next two years, the private sector would have to create 583,000 new jobs every month over the next two years. This number is far greater than the 127,000 that Obama’s own Department of Labor predicts will be created each month over the next ten years.

My hope is that in Obama’s second year in office, he replaces his Clinton-era Treasury Department officials with a new slate of advisors like the ones he had during his campaign.  To better understand what is taking place in Treasury, I suggest reading Matt Tiabbi’s excellent piece on Obama’s Treasury Department “Obama’s Big Sellout.” My favorite quote, the page on which I also hope some young intern leaves open on Obama’s coffee table is this:

“Virtually all of the Rubinites brought in to manage the economy under Obama share the same fundamental political philosophy carefully articulated for years by the Hamilton Project: Expand the safety net to protect the poor, but let Wall Street do whatever it wants.”Bob Rubin, these guys, they’re classic limousine liberals,” says David Sirota, a former Democratic strategist. “These are basically people who have made shitloads of money in the speculative economy, but they want to call themselves good Democrats because they’re willing to give a little more to the poor. That’s the model for this Democratic Party: Let the rich do their thing, but give a fraction more to everyone else.”

Comments OffCategories: News

Unemployment change by county – interractive map

December 10, 2009 · Comments Off

Comments OffCategories: News

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka on November Jobs Report

December 8, 2009 · Comments Off

Hopeful Signs, But No Time for Complacency

December 4, 2009

The November jobs numbers include hopeful signs, but this is no time for complacency. As the year ends, a painfully large number of people are without jobs. Creating jobs is an urgent priority. The economy shed 11,000 jobs in November, the smallest decline since the recession began nearly two years ago. Nevertheless, the unemployment rate is at 10 percent, twice as high as when the recession began.

Fifteen million workers are formally unemployed and a record 38 percent have been without a job for 27 weeks or longer. Clearly, the economic freefall of the early part of this year seems to have been arrested by the Obama administration’s Recovery Plan. The economy even posted modest growth over the summer. But so far, the growth we have seen is still very fragile and depends almost entirely on factors that are scheduled to expire next year, long before most economists expect to see robust growth in employment.

There is still no sign of a sustainable private-sector recovery that will be necessary to create the millions of new jobs Americans need. And jobs remain desperately hard to find for all Americans – but especially for young working people and workers of color.

Unless urgent action is taken now, there is no reason to believe that we can sustain the current recovery or create the millions of new jobs we need, much less produce the strong, equitable and sustainable growth we need to build going forward.

President Obama took an important first step yesterday in convening a jobs summit at the White House to discuss immediate steps that can be taken to create jobs. We need a bolder program to create jobs now and make the economy work for everyone again. At the White House summit the AFL-CIO outlined a five step plan that can be immediately implemented to create or save 2 million jobs:

1. Extend the lifeline for jobless workers.

Unless Congress acts now, supplemental unemployment benefits, additional food assistance and expansion of COBRA health care benefits will expire at the end of the year. They must be extended for another 12 months to prevent working families from bankruptcy, home foreclosure and loss of health care. Extending benefits also will boost personal spending and create jobs throughout the economy.

2. Rebuild America’s schools, roads and energy systems.

America still has at least $2.2 trillion in unmet infrastructure needs. We should put people to work to fix our nation’s broken-down school buildings and invest in transportation, green technology, energy efficiency and more.

3. Increase aid to state and local governments to maintain vital services.

State and local governments and school districts have a $178 billion budget shortfall this year alone—while the recession creates greater need for their services. States and communities must get help to maintain critical frontline services, prevent massive job cuts and avoid deep damage to education just when our children need it most.

4. Put people to work doing work that needs to be done.

If the private sector can’t or won’t provide the needed jobs, the government should step up to the plate, putting people who need jobs together with work that needs to be done. These should never be replacements for existing public jobs. They must pay competitive wages and should target distressed communities.

5. Put TARP funds to work for Main Street.

The bank bailout helped Wall Street, not Main Street. We should put some of the billions of dollars in leftover Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to work creating jobs by having community banks lend TARP money directly to small- and medium-size businesses. If small businesses can get credit, they will create jobs. As the recovery moves forward we must continue concrete actions to create jobs, because until that happens, the recession will not end for America’s workers.

Comments OffCategories: News

When the Paycheck Stops: Forum on Economic Crisis

November 23, 2009 · Comments Off



Agenda

Tuesday, December 1st
5:30 – 7:30 p.m.
Home Front

5:30 – 6:00: Dinner

Opening Remarks
Dick Fallow

Foreclosures in the QCA
Neighborhood Housing Services –
Brook Hayes Upton

Foreclosure Mitigation & Rapid Rehousing
Project Now – Molli Nickerson
Community Action of Eastern Iowa –
Christina Kelly

Landlord / Tenant Issues
HELP Legal Assistance – Janelle Swanberg
Prairie State Legal Aid – Michelle Fitzsimmons

Utility & Rent Assistance
Friendly House – Jodi Stock
Project Now – Molli Nickerson

Weatherization Programs
Community Action of Eastern Iowa –
Christina Kelly
Project Now – Stella Schneekloth

Consumer Financial Protection
Citizen Action Illinois – Jen Hall DeKock

Drawing for Door Prize
Wednesday, December 2nd
5:30 – 7:30 p.m.
Money Matters

5:30 – 6:00 Dinner

Opening Remarks
Dino Leone

Job Training & Education Opportunities
Success Network – Jeanette Dawson

Finding a Job
Iowa @ Work – Charlotte Rashid

Crisis Intervention
United Neighbors – Dr. Ida Johnson

Illinois Budget Deficit
Center for Tax and Budget Accountability – Ralph Martire

Iowa Budget Cuts
Iowa Policy Project – David Osterberg

Drawing for Door Prize


Thursday, December 3rd
5:30 – 7:30 p.m.
Affordable Health Care Options

5:30 – 6:00: Dinner

Opening Remarks
Jerry Messer

211 / Info link
United Way – Lisa DeBates

Food Vouchers
Salvation Army – Holly Nomura

Eating Healthy: Food on a Budget
Churches United – Rev. Ron Quay
Angel Food Cares – Sandy Muse

Affordable Health Care
Community Health Care – George Barton
Edgerton Women’s Health Center –
Annika O’Melia

Unemployment Stress
Vera French Health Center – Carla Bachelor
Transitions – Gary Weinstein

Health Care Reform Legislation
Democracy for America – Dr. Alta Price
Progressive Action for the Common Good – Karen Metcalf

Drawing for Door Prize

Comments OffCategories: News